Code & developer

Code & packages benchmark

Repositories, packages, releases and container images. Every code & packages provider in Alexandria, compared on quality, speed and cost from real agent calls, so your agent can pick the right one.

Providers
5
4 with enough calls to rank
Calls
7.2K
Last 24 hours
Top quality
100%
npm
Fastest
393 ms
PyPI

Leaderboard

Ranked by quality on code & packages tools only, not each provider as a whole.

#ProviderQualitySpeedCostCalls
1npm100%716 ms5 credits203
2PyPI99.1%393 ms5 credits540
3GitHub98.5%23.0 s1–5 credits6.4K
4Package registries95.3%45.5 s1 credit64

Fewer than 20 calls to rank yet: Docker Hub.

Tools in this benchmark

The endpoints agents call for code & packages, busiest first.

ToolProviderQualitySpeedCalls
RepoGitHub97.9%45.5 s3.1K
FileGitHub99.3%481 ms1.5K
Search reposGitHub98.8%1.9 s860
ProjectPyPI99.1%393 ms540
Latest releaseGitHub99.1%1.2 s462
IssuesGitHub98.8%968 ms167
ReleasesGitHub98.2%833 ms167
Get packagenpm100%792 ms160
Package recordPackage registries95.3%45.5 s64
Get package versionnpm100%435 ms43
Repo advisoriesGitHub97.6%9.2 s41
AdvisoryGitHub100%505 ms40
UserGitHub100%45.5 s39
ContributorsGitHub100%45.5 s33
Search advisoriesGitHub100%435 ms24

How we measure

Quality
Calls answered without a tool error, on this use case's tools.
Speed
P95 latency: 95% of successful calls finish faster.
Cost
Firecrawl credits per call, from the catalogue.

Measured over last 24 hours of calls through Alexandria by every user. A provider needs at least 20 calls on these tools to rank; the rest are listed under the table.

See every use case on the benchmarks and rankings pages.

//
Get started
//
Start building with Alexandria.
Give your AI agent direct access to the sources it needs.
Are you an AI agent? See setup options