Finance
Financial statements & filings benchmark
Company financials, SEC and regulatory filings, ownership and funding. Every financial statements & filings provider in Alexandria, compared on quality, speed and cost from real agent calls, so your agent can pick the right one.
- Providers
- 4
- 4 with enough calls to rank
- Calls
- 5.5K
- Last 24 hours
- Top quality
- 100%
- Fireround
- Fastest
- 832 ms
- Fireround
Leaderboard
Ranked by quality on financial statements & filings tools only, not each provider as a whole.
| # | Provider | Quality | Speed | Cost | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Fireround | 100% | 832 ms | 5 credits | 432 |
| 2 | 99.7% | 1.3 s | 0–30 credits | 1.6K | |
| 3 | 99.5% | 1.4 s | 5 credits | 201 | |
| 4 | 98.1% | 33.5 s | 5 credits | 3.3K |
Tools in this benchmark
The endpoints agents call for financial statements & filings, busiest first.
| Tool | Provider | Quality | Speed | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filings | SEC EDGAR | 97.9% | 45.5 s | 1.3K |
| Search | SEC EDGAR | 98.8% | 45.5 s | 586 |
| Fund letter | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 531 ms | 543 |
| Sections | SEC EDGAR | 97.7% | 1.3 s | 428 |
| Concept | SEC EDGAR | 98.6% | 45.5 s | 424 |
| Search funding rounds | Fireround | 100% | 792 ms | 356 |
| Company | SEC EDGAR | 98.3% | 6.2 s | 230 |
| Daily prices | Fiscal.ai | 99.4% | 1.9 s | 170 |
| Holdings 13f | SEC EDGAR | 98.8% | 7.5 s | 163 |
| Income statement | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 1.6 s | 153 |
| Search projects | Kickstarter | 99.3% | 876 ms | 140 |
| Cash flow statement | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 1.9 s | 113 |
| Earnings call transcript | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 968 ms | 91 |
| Balance sheet | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 1.6 s | 82 |
| Filing | SEC EDGAR | 96.3% | 531 ms | 81 |
| Fund letters | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 833 ms | 78 |
| A company's funding rounds | Fireround | 100% | 1.0 s | 76 |
| Earnings calendar | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 5.0 s | 68 |
| Get project | Kickstarter | 100% | 2.6 s | 61 |
| Insider transactions | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 3.4 s | 60 |
| Company directory | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 682 ms | 56 |
| Institutional holders | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 1.9 s | 55 |
| Segments and KPIs | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 921 ms | 49 |
| IR event resources | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 792 ms | 30 |
| Intraday prices | Fiscal.ai | 86.7% | 481 ms | 30 |
| Companies get | SEC EDGAR | 92.9% | 457 ms | 28 |
| Ratios by period | Fiscal.ai | 100% | 1.1 s | 27 |
How we measure
- Quality
- Calls answered without a tool error, on this use case's tools.
- Speed
- P95 latency: 95% of successful calls finish faster.
- Cost
- Firecrawl credits per call, from the catalogue.
Measured over last 24 hours of calls through Alexandria by every user. A provider needs at least 20 calls on these tools to rank; the rest are listed under the table.
More Finance benchmarks
- Economic indicators22 providers · 3.7K calls
- Market prices & quotes13 providers · 1.7K calls
- Banking & credit1 providers
See every use case on the benchmarks and rankings pages.
//
Get started
//
Start building with Alexandria.
Give your AI agent direct access to the sources it needs.
Are you an AI agent? See setup options